The mechanism: In 2024, Illinois ditched its flat 15% sports betting tax for a graduated structure that climbs from 20% on the first $30 million of adjusted gross receipts up to 40% above $200 million — squarely targeting the biggest books. Chicago layered on its own 10.25% city tax for 2026. The result: both DraftKings and FanDuel now charge Illinois bettors a $0.50-per-wager transaction fee (effective since Labor Day) just to claw margin back. Illinois isn't an outlier — it's the template other cash-strapped statehouses are watching. Every legal-betting state can raise its rate at will, and several have. That makes tax-rate risk a permanent, recurring line item for every operator's model, not a one-time shock.
DKNG vs. FLUT: Who Actually Eats a State Tax Hike
Illinois' graduated betting tax and new per-wager fee are a live stress test — and Flutter's global FanDuel machine is built to absorb it in ways DraftKings' single-market book isn't.

Same state, same policy, same $0.50 fee — but the tax hike costs DraftKings nearly triple the share of EBITDA it costs Flutter.
Who cashes in: FLUT is the trade here. Flutter's FanDuel is the largest U.S. sportsbook by handle, but Flutter itself is a global portfolio — Paddy Power and Sky Bet in the UK/Ireland, Sisal in Italy, Betfair internationally, plus stakes in Brazil and beyond. When one jurisdiction's tax bill spikes (analysts pegged the UK's remote gaming duty jump from 21% to 40% at roughly $320 million of pre-mitigation EBITDA impact in 2026), the group absorbs it because dozens of other markets keep generating cash. Citizens analysts estimated Illinois' new per-wager fee adds back about $86 million for FanDuel, covering roughly 2% of Flutter's group EBITDA — a rounding error at the parent level. CZR and MGM also cash in relatively: both run diversified brick-and-mortar casino/resort cash flows (Las Vegas Strip, regional casinos) that dwarf their digital sportsbook segments, so a state tax hike on mobile betting barely dents consolidated EBITDA. PENN, now leaning on ESPN Bet, has a similar retail-casino cushion, though its digital scale is smaller and less proven.
Who is exposed: DKNG is the name actually on the hook. DraftKings has no Flutter-style international book and no casino-floor cash flow to lean on — its EBITDA is overwhelmingly a function of U.S. online sportsbook and iGaming hold. The same Citizens estimate that pegged Illinois' fee at ~2% of Flutter's EBITDA put it at roughly 5.4% of DraftKings' — nearly triple the proportional bite, in the same state, from the same policy. Every additional state that copies Illinois' graduated-rate playbook compounds that gap.
The play: This isn't about who wins Illinois — both books already passed the cost to bettors via the same $0.50 fee. It's about who protects consolidated EBITDA when the next high-tax state (and there will be one) does the same thing. Flutter's geographic and vertical diversification is a real balance-sheet moat; DraftKings' pure-play U.S. digital model is structurally the more tax-elastic stock. Watch state budget seasons — that's the calendar where this thesis gets re-tested.
Source: original report ↗
Free: catalyst alerts, straight to your inbox.
Get the White House orders, federal contracts, and FDA decisions that move money — with who cashes in — free. Unsubscribe in one click.
Free · weekly · unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.
Stay three moves ahead of every practice in your market.
Knowing it happened is table stakes. Money Racket Pro hands you the play — what each move means for your margins, your license, and your patients, and exactly what to do about it — in a two-minute brief, twice a week. The owners who read it never get blindsided.
Get the edge · $40/moJoin the owners who run ahead of the industry. Cancel anytime, one click.