Thursday, July 2, 2026 See who Washington just made rich Go Pro · $40/mo →
Money Racket
Who Cashes In When Washington Moves
DEFENSEThe F-35 Sustainment Lock-In: Why the Pentagon's Most Expensive Program Keeps Paying One Company ForevertodayHEALTHCARE340B Under Fire: The Hospital Drug Discount Fight That Hits CVS and HCA Where It Hurts4 weeks agoTRADE & TARIFFSThe Tariff Refund Portal Is Open and Companies Are Cashing In — Nike and FedEx Are the Names to WatchyesterdayHEALTHCAREGLP-1 Coverage Mandate: The Federal Obesity Drug Windfall for Lilly and Novo4 weeks agoMARKETSSupreme Court Gives Trump FTC Firing Power — Antitrust Enforcement Just Got More PoliticalyesterdayHEALTHCAREFDA Accelerated Approval Reform: The Vertex Model Every Biotech Wants4 weeks agoTRADE & TARIFFSTrump's Fertilizer Tariff Suspension Cuts Input Costs for Farmers — and Squeezes Domestic ProducersyesterdayHEALTHCAREThe Medicare Drug Negotiation Trade: Who Gets Hurt When Washington Sets the Price4 weeks agoDEFENSEThe Nuclear Triad Upgrade Cycle: Three Legs, Three Winners, Decades of Locked-In SpendingyesterdayCRYPTOThe Anti-CBDC Play: No Digital Dollar Means Private Rails Win4 weeks agoDEFENSEWhen the Pentagon Classifies a Budget Line: The Black Budget Trade2 days agoCRYPTOThe Toll Booth at the Top of the Bitcoin ETF Stack4 weeks agoDEFENSENATO's 2% Mandate Is a Revenue Stream Disguised as an Alliance Obligation3 days agoCRYPTOThe IRS Closes the Crypto Wash-Sale Loophole — and Robinhood Collects the Toll4 weeks agoDEFENSEThe Drone Proliferation Trade: Washington's Shift to Attritable Unmanned Systems Creates a Recurring Revenue Stream3 days agoCRYPTOThe Debanking Era Is Over. HOOD and Block Are Next in Line at the Window.4 weeks agoDEFENSEThe Hypersonic Arms Race Has a Bottleneck — and Three Contractors Own It4 days agoCRYPTOMining the Grid: How EPA and Energy Policy Set the Spread for Proof-of-Work Miners3 weeks agoDEFENSEThe Pentagon's AI Mandate: Why Defense Data Platforms Are Now a Weapons Program5 days agoCRYPTOThe Stablecoin Bill: Who Controls the On-Ramp When Congress Licenses It3 weeks agoDEFENSEIron Dome and the FMS Pipeline: How Middle East Tensions Fund Missile Defense Primes5 days agoCRYPTOBitcoin as Reserve Asset: The Federal Legitimacy Trade3 weeks agoENERGYThe SPR Refill Trade: Who Gets Paid When Washington Buys Oil6 days agoCRYPTOThe SEC Retreat: How a Friendlier Regulator Unlocks Coinbase's Business Model3 weeks agoENERGYLNG Export Licenses: How a FERC Approval Mints a Monopolylast weekTECHThe Federal Data Center Mandate: How Washington's AI Spending Flows to Hardware3 weeks agoENERGYThe BLM Calendar That Moves COP and OXYlast weekTECHThe Domestic Equipment Play: How Foreign Chip Tool Restrictions Hand Applied Materials a Structural Edge3 weeks agoENERGYThe Permian Methane Rule: Why Stricter EPA Standards Are a HAL and SLB Giftlast weekTECHThe AI Diffusion Rule Is Picking Winners Inside the Chip Stack — and It Is Not Who You Think3 weeks agoENERGYThe Permit Logjam Is Breaking: Williams and Kinder Morgan Hold the Keyslast weekTECHThe HBM Monopoly: How Federal Memory Standards Lock In Micron3 weeks agoENERGYThe Tax Code Oil Patch: Who Gets Crushed If Washington Kills the IDC Deductionlast weekTECHThe Tariff Arbitrage: How Chip Import Duties Reshape the Foundry Map3 weeks agoENERGYThe Pipe Tax: How Section 232 Steel Tariffs Rewire U.S. Drilling Economicslast weekTECHThe Chip Stack Below the Pentagon's AI Buildup3 weeks agoENERGYSanctions Relief and the LNG Arbitrage: When State Department Decisions Move the Henry Hublast weekTECHThe CHIPS Act Subsidy Ladder: Who Actually Receives the $39 Billion3 weeks agoENERGYThe Nuclear Production Tax Credit Trade: Who Gets Paid to Keep Old Reactors Alivelast weekENERGYThe Grid Hardening Bill Trade: How Federal Transmission Investment Lifts the Equipment Makers2 weeks agoENERGYThe Uranium Supply Squeeze: How the Russian Import Ban Flows to Cameco and Centruslast weekTECHThe Export Control Squeeze: BIS Chip Rules Are Splitting the AI Hardware Market in Two2 weeks agoENERGYThe SMR Funding Funnel: How DOE's Loan Billions Flow to Small Modular Reactorslast weekENERGYThe Only U.S. HALEU Cascade: How Centrus Became the Gatekeeper to the Advanced Reactor Boom2 weeks agoENERGYWashington Plugs AI Into Reactors: The Behind-the-Meter Nuclear Offtake Trade2 weeks agoENERGYThe Grid Reliability Mandate: FERC's Capacity Market Rules Are Writing Checks to Nuclear2 weeks agoENERGYThe Nuclear Restart Order: Only One Operator Has Actually Flipped the Switch2 weeks ago
That's your last free article this week. Create a free account for 4 a week — or go Pro for everything.Go Pro →
Energy

The Tax Code Oil Patch: Who Gets Crushed If Washington Kills the IDC Deduction

The intangible drilling cost deduction is the biggest federal tax break in oil and gas — and independent-heavy drillers like COP and OXY have the most to lose if Congress ever touches it.

Image: Money Racket
By at Money Racket · Jun 22, 2026

Every time a drill bit turns in American shale country, Washington quietly picks up part of the tab. The mechanism is the intangible drilling cost (IDC) deduction — a provision baked into the Internal Revenue Code that lets oil and gas operators expense up to 100 percent of certain drilling costs (labor, chemicals, mud, fuel — everything that leaves no salvage value) in the year they are incurred rather than depreciating them over the life of the well. For a capital-intensive industry where a single Permian Basin horizontal well can cost $7 to $10 million, front-loading that deduction is not a rounding error. It is a structural competitive advantage that independent producers depend on to fund their next hole.

The IDC preference has surfaced in nearly every major tax reform debate for decades, most recently in Congressional discussions over deficit reduction and corporate minimum tax structures. Any serious reform that caps, defers, or eliminates IDC expensing would land unevenly — and the split follows a clear fault line: independents versus integrated majors.

For a capital-intensive industry where a single Permian Basin horizontal well can cost $7 to $10 million, front-loading that deduction is not a rounding error. It is a structural competitive advantage that independent producers depend on to fund their next hole.

Who cashes in (status quo defenders):

COP (ConocoPhillips) is among the most exposed — and therefore among the loudest defenders of the status quo. As one of the largest pure-play independent producers in the U.S., ConocoPhillips drills aggressively across the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. IDC expensing directly compresses its effective tax rate; any curtailment hits free cash flow before it can be returned to shareholders via buybacks.

OXY (Occidental Petroleum) carries this risk even more acutely. Occidental's domestic drilling program in the Permian is enormous relative to its capital base, and the company still carries debt from its 2019 Anadarko acquisition. IDC deductions improve near-term cash generation that services that debt. A cap or phase-out tightens that cushion immediately.

HAL (Halliburton) wins when operators drill more wells. Any policy that raises the after-tax cost of drilling reduces rig activity, and Halliburton — whose revenue is almost entirely completion services and drilling technology — is the first call-down when operators throttle capex.

Who is exposed (if IDC is reformed):

XOM (ExxonMobil) and CVX (Chevron) would absorb an IDC reform more comfortably than the independents. Both integrate upstream drilling with refining, chemicals, and global LNG operations that generate diversified cash flows. Their effective tax positions are also shaped by foreign tax credits and international production structures that IDC reform touches less directly. Neither is immune, but neither is existentially dependent on the deduction the way a pure-play driller is.

The play: Watch Congress's budget reconciliation windows and any Joint Committee on Taxation revenue estimates that score IDC reform as a "pay-for." COP and OXY share prices tend to reprice faster than the majors on credible reform headlines — the gap in sensitivity is the signal. The independent drillers' lobbying posture through the American Petroleum Institute is the early-warning system; when that spending spikes, the threat is real.

Source: original report ↗

Free alerts

Free: catalyst alerts, straight to your inbox.

Get the White House orders, federal contracts, and FDA decisions that move money — with who cashes in — free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Free · weekly · unsubscribe anytime. Privacy.

Stay three moves ahead of every practice in your market.

Knowing it happened is table stakes. Money Racket Pro hands you the play — what each move means for your margins, your license, and your patients, and exactly what to do about it — in a two-minute brief, twice a week. The owners who read it never get blindsided.

Get the edge · $40/mo

Join the owners who run ahead of the industry. Cancel anytime, one click.

Discussion

    Leave a comment

    Comments are reviewed before they appear.
    Money Racket Pro

    By the time it's news, the money's already moved.

    The contract award, the executive order, the tariff cut — it mints winners before the financial press connects the dots. Pro gets you there first: what happened, who cashes in, and exactly what to watch — in a two-minute read.

    Go Pro · $40/mo The policy-to-profit brief. Cancel anytime.
    The pre-market brief · Mon–Sat, 7:45am ET Go Pro · $40/mo →